WHEN IT COMES TO U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
IS IT TRUE THAT 78 MILLION OF US DO NOT EXIST?
Gary M. Kuhn
St Martin Systems, Inc.
August 6, 2004
WHEN IT COMES TO U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
IS IT TRUE THAT 78 MILLION OF US DO NOT EXIST?
When voting for President, the United States does not use a system of "l person, l vote". Instead, in each state some large number of people is allocated a single "Electoral College" vote.
Each state's Electoral College representation is the same as its
representation in the bicameral Congress. Specifically, each state
receives
- 2 electors, 1 for each Senator from the state, plus
- 1 elector per House district in the state.
The total number of
electors is 538: 100 "Senate" electors plus 435 "House" electors plus 3
electors for Washington D.C.
A problem with this system of representation is that the number of people per electoral vote varies greatly from state to state. In California there is 1 electoral vote for every 615,000 people; in Wyoming, there is 1 electoral vote for every 164,000 people. See the table below.
Assume that an equal percentage of people actually does vote in each state. It follows that in presidential elections a voter in California weighs only 0.27 as much (164/615) as a voter in Wyoming, in his or her electoral contribution.
California and Wyoming illustrate the extremes, but this electoral college system down-weights the largest states generally: a voter in the 25 most populous states weighs only 0.67 as much (378/566) as a voter in the 25 least populous states plus Washington D.C.
Some fail to grasp the significance of this down-weighting. Decreasing the weight of each voter in the 25 most populous states has the same effect as giving full weight to some of those voters but denying the existence of the others. In the Electoral College the result would be the same: down-weighting a population by a fraction has the same effect as pretending that some number of people does not exist.
Specifically, by decreasing the weight of persons in the 25 most populous states such that they weigh only 0.67 as much, their effective population is reduced to 157 million, one-third less than the 235 million people in those states: i.e. in the Electoral College, it is as though 78 million of these people do not exist.
Looked at in this way, the 21 most populous states suffer a population loss of 64.5 million people. That number is greater than the total population in the other 29 states plus Washington D.C., which is only 63.7 million people:
If the United States' government decided that in presidential elections, it was going to pretend that all the people in the 29 states with the smallest populations plus Washington D.C. do not exist, I believe the public would not stand for it. Yet, when the government pretends that a greater number of people does not exist in the 21 most populous states, does anybody care?
Technically, this problem could be solved by dropping the 2 senatorial electors per state, since the number of people per House district is roughly equal in all states. See the last column of the table below. The political likelihood of such a solution is another matter.
D=Democrat Electoral R=Republican Popn/ Popn/ Population Votes Senate House Electoral House State census 2000 81-90 01-10 D:R D:R Vote Vote 01 California 33,871,648 47 55 2:0 33:20 615848 639087 02 Texas 20,851,820 29 34 0:2 16:16 613288 651619 03 New York 18,976,457 36 31 2:0 19:10 612144 654360 04 Florida 15,982,378 21 27 2:0 7:18 591939 639295 05 Illinois 12,419,293 24 21 1:1 9:10 591395 653647 06 Pennsylvania 12,281,054 25 21 0:2 7:12 584812 646371 07 Ohio 11,353,140 23 20 0:2 6:12 567657 630730 08 Michigan 9,938,444 20 17 2:0 6:9 584614 662562 09 New Jersey 8,414,350 16 15 2:0 7:6 560957 647257 10 Georgia 8,186,453 12 15 1:1 5:8 545763 629727 11 North Carolina 8,049,313 13 15 1:1 6:7 536621 619177 12 Virginia 7,078,515 12 13 0:2 3:8 544501 643501 13 Massachusetts 6,349,097 13 12 2:0 10:0 529091 634909 14 Indiana 6,080,485 12 11 1:1 3:6 552771 675609 15 Washington 5,894,121 10 11 2:0 6:3 538829 654902 16 Tennessee 5,689,283 11 11 0:2 5:4 517208 632142 17 Missouri 5,595,211 11 11 0:2 4:5 508656 621690 18 Wisconsin 5,363,675 11 10 2:0 4:4 536368 670459 19 Maryland 5,296,486 10 10 2:0 6:2 529649 662060 20 Arizona 5,130,632 7 10 0:2 2:6 513063 641329 21 Minnesota 4,919,479 10 10 1:1 4:4 491948 614934 22 Louisiana 4,468,976 10 9 2:0 3:4 496553 638425 23 Alabama 4,447,100 9 9 0:2 2:5 494122 635300 24 Colorado 4,301,261 8 9 0:2 2:5 477918 614465 25 Kentucky 4,041,769 9 8 0:2 2:4 505221 673628 26 South Carolina 4,012,012 8 8 1:1 2:4 501502 668668 27 Oklahoma 3,450,654 8 7 0:2 1:4 492951 690130 28 Oregon 3,421,399 7 7 1:1 4:1 488771 684279 29 Connecticut 3,405,565 8 7 2:0 2:3 486509 684279 30 Iowa 2,926,324 8 7 1:1 1:4 418046 585264 31 Mississippi 2,844,658 7 6 0:2 2:2 474110 711164 32 Kansas 2,688,418 7 6 0:2 1:3 448070 672104 33 Arkansas 2,673,400 6 6 2:0 3:1 445567 668350 34 Utah 2,233,169 5 5 0:2 1:2 446634 744389 35 Nevada 1,998,257 4 5 1:1 1:2 399651 666085 36 New Mexico 1,819,046 5 5 1:1 1:2 363809 606348 37 West Virginia 1,808,344 6 5 2:0 2:1 361167 602781 38 Nebraska 1,711,263 5 5 1:1 0:3 342253 570421 39 Idaho 1,293,953 4 4 0:2 0:2 323488 646976 40 Maine 1,274,923 4 4 0:2 2:0 318731 637461 41 New Hampshire 1,235,786 4 4 0:2 0:2 308947 617893 42 Hawaii 1,211,537 4 4 2:0 2:0 302884 605768 43 Rhode Island 1,048,319 4 4 1:1 2:0 262080 524195 44 Montana 904,433 4 3 1:1 0:1 301478 904433 45 Delaware 783,600 3 3 2:0 0:1 261200 783600 46 South Dakota 754,844 3 3 2:0 1:0 251615 754844 47 North Dakota 642,200 3 3 2:0 1:0 214067 642200 48 Alaska 626,932 3 3 0:2 0:1 208977 626932 49 Vermont 608,827 3 3 1:1:0* 1:0:0* 202942 608827 50 Wyoming 493,782 3 3 0:2 0:1 164594 493782 D.C. 563,384 3 3 0:0 0:0 187795 - * Vermont has 1 Independent in both the Senate and the House